Article: 19861101036

Title: ECSTASY ON TRIAL

19861101036
198611010036
HighTimes_19861101_0013_135_0036.xml
ECSTASY ON TRIAL
0362-630X
High Time
Trans-High Corporation
FEATURES
32
32,33,34,35,60,86
article
When the federal government's Drug Enforcement Administration invoked its emergency powers and placed MDMA on Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, a number of people thought that the last had been heard on the subject. They were wrong.
Illustrations
Photographs
32
33
34
35
60
86
Media
KATE KELLER
Media
Media
Media

ECSTASY ON TRIAL

When the federal government's Drug Enforcement Administration invoked its emergency powers and placed MDMA on Schedule I of the Controlled Substances Act, a number of people thought that the last had been heard on the subject. They were wrong. Rarely in our history has a conscious effective substance so excited both mass media and the public imagination as has MDMA. In the months prior to its scheduling, virtually every major newspaper and television network did a feature on MDMA. Such diverse magazines as Life, Cosmopolitan, New York, and HIGH TIMES (Nov. `85) each did their own version of "in depth" studies on the drug. Some of the reports have been from the viewpoint of researchers and clinicians who have worked with MDMA as an adjunct to psychotherapy. Others are from the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Often, they sound as though they are talking about two totally different substances.

A corporate lawyer who, fifteen years ago, attended rock concerts on a regular basis, can barely contain his enthusiasm when he talks about MDMA.

“I’ve been taking it for a long time,” he says briskly. “I don’t take it very often, but I take it regularly. And it’s the only drug aside from an occasional beer or glass of wine that I do use. I don’t mess with cocaine like a lot of guys in my profession do. Who needs it? Let me tell you, it’s a real revolutionary drug. It’s totally different from LSD. If nothing else brings about world peace, Ecstasy will.”

The lawyer felt that all his experience with MDMA had been positive. The reaction of a San Francisco-based drug abuse counselor who tried it once was less than enthusiastic:

“I got three tablets from a friend who I considered reliable in terms of contents, but I didn’t know what dosage each tab contained and neither did he. I was going to save them and trip with my roommate in the country over the weekend, but in that I had three tabs, I decided to try one on Friday night. I had eaten dinner about an hour earlier and had a couple of beers after.

“I swallowed one tablet and waited, and waited. Nothing happened. About an hour later, I took another half tab. Nothing was changing. Nothing was happening. It occurred to me that the dosage per tab might be very low so, what the hell, I swallowed the last tablet.

“Within a few minutes it all hit me at once and I was on the phone to Suicide Prevention. I knew that I was about to lose control, not pass out but black out. I had had enough experience with PCP victims and clients on high doses of amphetamines to know that out of control, blacked out but still able to function at a physical level, I could be a danger to myself and to others. My pulse was going a mile a minute. I was slipping into a wide awake unconsciousness and I was scared. Fortunately, I was also experienced in dealing with bad trips and other drug reactions from work. Also, thankfully, there was no real ego disruption. The counselor at Suicide Prevention stayed on the phone and talked me through the crises, which lasted about half an hour. My jaw kept clenching throughout that night and most of the next day.”

A graduate student from Texas referred to his experience on MDMA as “.. .getting to Stage Two.”

“Most of my friends use it recreationally, you know, on the weekends to relax and feel good about themselves. I started out doing that too, but what happened was like I learned something. It was like getting beyond myself and making contact with a higher reality. What I want to know now is, is it really real?”

David E. Smith, M.D. looks like he could play sixty minutes of rough and tumble professional football with the San Francisco 49ers on a Saturday afternoon, then go home, change into a tuxedo and conduct the San Francisco symphony at Davies Hall that evening. Instead, in 1967, he founded the Haight Ashbury Free Medical Clinic.

Although the Haight Ashbury Free Medical Clinic provides a wide range of medical services, its national reputation is based on drug abuse research and treatment. Working in a national epicenter of street drug experimentation, the Clinic’s physicians, counselors, pharmacists, researchers, and epidemiologists have often been the first to point out new trends in substance use and abuse that have later been reflected nationwide.

Clients treated in the Clinic’s drug treatment facilities usually come in voluntarily. The Clinic has a basic philosophy that health care is a right, not a privilege, and that it should be humane, demystified, nonjudgmental and free at the point of delivery. That philosophy, plus a street reputation for humane treatment, confidentiality, knowledge, and expertise in the field of substance abuse treatment attracts a wide range of highly diversified patients.

One of our public information activities is a monthly drug abuse folio column that is published in HIGH TIMES. The column provides current information, history, effects, myths, and dangers of individual psychoactive drugs. It was as a result of our HIGH TIMES column that Dr. Smith and I first became aware that the street use of MDMA was becoming an issue. We had published a column in March of 1983 on MDA in which we discussed the nature, use, hazards, and liabilities of all the methoxylated amphetamines. MDMA was not specifically mentioned.

MDMA has stirred up more controversy than any mind-altering drug since LSD. RICK SEYMOUR of the HaightAshbury Free Medical Clinic tells why.

A year later, in March of 1984, I got a phone call from Helio Costa, the bureau chief of the Brazilian national television network, Globo TV. The network was concerned, he explained, over the proliferation of a new drug in Rio de Janeiro and other urban centers in Brazil. The users were calling it “Ecstasy.” One of Helio’s colleagues had read our MDA column and thought it sounded like a similar drug.

Following up on that interview, we investigated the nature of Ecstasy through our national network. Dr. John Morgan, a colleague at the Sophie Davis School of Medicine in New York, reported to us that samples of material sold there as Ecstasy and Adam had proved on testing to be “either MDA, MMDA, or a new drug called MDMA.” We later got similar reports from PharmChem Laboratories in Palo Alto, California.

PharmChem reported a 50% validity rate for alleged MDMA samples submitted to their Analysis Anonymous service for qualitative analysis between 1978 and 1983. During the five year period, they compiled data on sixty samples that were submitted as MDMA, MDM, Ecstasy, XTC, or Adam. They say there is no way of knowing if clients submitting samples under street names actually understood what they were supposed to be. These street names have only become popular synonyms for MDMA since the recent widespread publicity about the drug.

We began asking the questions, just what is MDMA? And who is using it?

A paradoxical chemical in many ways, MDMA is often thought of as a “new” drug, even though it was first synthesized in 1914. MDMA is a synthetic drug.In synthesis, one or more substances are molecularly changed and may be combined to form a new substance. This process distinguishes synthetics from chemicals that are direct extracts or purifications of an existing substance. Similar in structure to both MDA (or 3,4-methylenedioxyamphetamine), and the aromatic substitution patttern of the essential oil safrole, MDMA is synthesized from molecular components of methamphetamine and safrole from sassafrass, nutmeg, or piperonylacetone.

It belongs to a large group of synthetic drugs called the phenethylamines. These differ in their effects, depending on their molecular structure. Some of these drugs are relatively inactive. Others, including the drugs that we usually think of as amphetamines, produce a stimulant effect coupled with feelings of euphoria. Still others are consciousness effective and produce both psychedelic and stimulant effects. MDMA belongs to this latter group.

MDMA is most similar to a sub-group of amphetamines that are called “methoxylated amphetamines.” These drugs are

similar to mescaline, the active ingredient in the psychedelic buttons of the peyote plant found in the southwestern United States and Mexico.

MDMA is a psychoactive drug. This means that its primary effects are on the psyche. It can also be called a central nervous system, or CNS, effective drug in that it interacts directly with the brain and spinal column, the central nervous system, to produce its effects.

Although there are many psychoactive, CNS effective drugs, they all fall within three primary categories. There are “downers,” which include pain killers or analgesics and sedative-hypnotics; uppers or stimulants; and psychedelics. There are other drugs which effect the central ner-

vous system, including antipsychotic drugs.

The efects of MDMA are similar to those found in both the stimulant and psychedelic categories and also has some unique effects that are not common to any of the three psychoactive drugs. In the opinion of some researchers who have worked with the drug, any direct comparison to either stimulants or psychedelics would be very misleading. Their conclusion is that MDMA has a unique pharmacology that cannot be properly described within the existing categories. Further, they note that its actions are not even all that similar to those of its closest chemical neighbors, MDA and the other methoxylated amphetamines.

If it is not a psychedelic, if it is not a stimulant—and it is certainly now an analgesic or a sedative-hypnotic—then what is MDMA?

It may be the prototype of an entirely new drug category. David E. Nichols, Ph.D., who is currently studying a series of chemicals that he has called “entactogens,” stated in testimony to the federal MDMA hearings that the effects of MDMA are unique in their own right. He compared its potential importance to that of diethyl ether and nitrous oxide in the development of general anesthetics that led to modern surgery. Other researchers maintain, further, that the effects of MDMA are not psychedelic, but represent

a revolutionary means of furthering mental health treatment and exploration that has not been available through any previous source.

Those who have worked with MDMA state that although it can be looked on as consciousness-altering, and therefore called “psychedelic” for want of a better term, it is not hallucinogenic. The drug does not appear to cause visual hallucinations or distortions nor is it reported to lead to a delusional state. Subjects involved in medical research have not reported any of the ego loss, disassociation or mental confusion that can occur with psychedelic drugs.

According to therapists who have administered the drug to clients, MDMA is

characterized as bringing about conditions of peacefulness, an ability to feel trust, a lowering of psychological barriers and reported increases in insight. It provides these clients an opportunity to see clearly and dispassionately within themselves by opening out the blocks these clients have created between their own consciousness and suppressed painful experience. These effects, occurring at therapeutic dosages, are cited as what makes MDMA potentially valuable when used within a course of psychotherapy.

A number of anecdotal cases have been cited wherein the appropriate and sensitive use of MDMA with patients in the course of psychotherapy seems to have led to major treatment breakthroughs. Patients with problems that include longterm communication blockages and psychic traumas such as rape, the onset of terminal illness, and delayed stress, have been reported as benefiting from MDMA therapy.

Although MDMA is said to be free of the clinically less desirable effects associated with many other psychoactive drugs, such as visual distortions, loss of coordination, and intoxication, there are exceptions and reactions vary with the individual. The drug is, after all, still in an experimental state.

Researchers and health professionals unanimously agree that MDMA should never be used for recreational purposes or without adequate medical supervision. It is not a drug for recreation, intoxication, performance enhancement, or self-medication. The proper use, as they see it, is for specific and carefully planned and supervised sessions within a course of psychotherapy or other mental health treatment, or for directed research on human consciousness. MDMA is not a toy.

But the Haight Ashbury Free Medical Clinic drug treatment staff reported that MDMA was being used recreationally. At least what was called MDMA, or MDM, or Adam, or Ecstasy, was being used.

In the twilight world of illicit or street drugs, things are rarely what they seem. Often easily obtainable substances are disguised to resemble others that are in demand but harder to get. The notion that habitual users can tell the difference between their drug of choice and a counterfeit is often a myth.

Treatment centers will not always know what specific drug a client may have used. It takes sophisticated drug testing equipment to tell the difference between two drugs as similar in structure as MDA and MDMA. The process is also comparatively expensive and unnecessary for symptomatic treatment of sympathomimetic reactions. In such cases, the Clinic’s staff usually takes the word of the client for what they have taken. The client, for that matter, has usually taken thé word of the person who sold the drug as to what is in it. With MDMA and the methoxylated amphetamines, as is the case with most stimulants and psychedelics, the acute toxicity symptoms that are usually seen in treatment are similar and result from taking too much of the drug. These dose related symptoms usually dissipate as the drug wears off, and the patient can be discharged within a few hours.

continued on page 60

continued from page 35

In treatment data, MDMA is lumped in with the methoxylated amphetamines. The acute toxicity symptoms for all of these involve anxiety, fear reactions usually accompanied by a racing pulse and rapid heartbeat, paranoia—sometimes with delusion—and a sufficient sense of unease to prompt their seeking treatment. Treatment usually begins with reassuring the patient that these feelings are a result of taking too much of the drug, are not dangerous, and will wear off as the drug wears off. There is some variation depending on the individual. In some cases, these patients come back for a series of counseling sessions. In most cases, a talkdown similar to that used for psychedelic bad trips is sufficient.

More severe reactions to what users believed to be MDMA have been reported, including prolonged psychotic reactions, but we haven’t seen them. As with any consciousness-effective drug, these psychotic breaks can happen, especially if the user has underlying psychopathology.

MDMA is a relatively recent addition to the national phamacopia. There is not enough hard use data to firmly establish just where it is on the abuse spectrum. Certain intrinsic qualities indicate that MDMA is probably a psychoactive substance with a generally low abuse potential. These qualities include a short period of effect, two to six hours, and a reported lack of incentive to immediately readminister the drug. This may be partially due to a rapid onset of short-term tolerance, or a diminishing of desired effects. Subjects report that at dosages only a little above those used in treatment, MDMA ceases to have any further desirable effect and only increases the undesirable “wired” feelings.

A major area of concern is the quality control of MDMA manufacture. While some intrinsic quality control in a clinical setting could be provided by physicians synthesizing their own under competent supervision, no such assurance exists for MDMA manufactured underground for non-medical consumption.

On the illicit drug market, the byword is caveat emptor, let the buyer beware. Manufacturers of street drugs are not answerable to the Food and Drug Administration

or any other agency for the quality, or even the contents of their products. Under current conditions, there is no way at all, short of arresting all the currently illicit

manufacturers, of controlling the street preparations that are sold as MDMA, no

continued on page 86

Media
KATE KELLER
Media
Media
Media

continued from page 60

ECS 1ASY ON I RIAL Is MDMA the recreational drug of choice of the future, a trendy fad, or a potentially abusive substance?

matter what they may actually contain.

MDMA usually appears as a cream colored or very light tan crystalline powder, but color can be affected by anything from the binding agent to the manufacturer’s fancy. Some MDMA tablets reported to be from Texas are bright lemon yellow.

While some long-term intravenous amphetamine users have reported injecting large dosages of MDMA for the stimulant effects, it is usually swallowed in pill, capsule, or powder. There are no reports of insufflation or snorting. Street forms of the drug are reportedly sold in low dosages, ranging in price from $10.00 to $30.00 for approximately 50 mg. Unit measurements can vary greatly, however, with little correlation between price and dosage.

Most first, second, third, and multihand sources, including the media, identify several population groups wherein non-medical MDMA use appears. In the San Francisco Bay Area, at least, one of these is the gay community where the drug is called Adam. As Ecstasy, it is used by young, well-educated, professional men and women. Individuals in both these populations appear to limit their use to occasional recreational trips, often to enhance either self-realization or interpersonal communication. In spite of its exotic street names, MDMA doesn’t appear to be a sexual performance or coital sensitivity enhancer. It’s not an aphrodisiac.

Most of these users are young adults. There are reports from other parts of the country, however, that many college and high school students are using MDMA non-medically as well. Shortly before the emergency scheduling, both the DEA and sources within the state were reporting massive use on Texas university campuses.

Dr. David Smith identified another population of MDMA users through his communication with past clients of the Clinic’s drug treatment facilities. These were young urban folks who would probably be blue collar workers if they worked. Instead, they deal marijuana, cocaine and other substances, and added MDMA to their inventory and experimented with it themselves. Through these, we came in contact with a small population of chronic drug users who took MDMA on a regular and frequent basis. It’s my understanding that many of these have stopped using the drug, not because it’s less available since scheduling but because of increased toler-

ance losing the desirable effects. Several have cited fuzzy-headedness and difficulty in concentrating during chronic use as reasons for quitting.

The street supplies of MDMA probably come from underground laboratories. Street doses of the drug are often distributed by pre-existing marijuana and cocaine dealers. They have added it to their line, as it were.

By and large, these dealers see MDMA as strictly a temporary sideline. They shrug off its current notoriety.

“It’s a fad,” they say. “Next year it’ll be something else again.”

They cite the lack of a real psychedelic or euphoric “punch” and point out that MDMA doesn’t produce a rush like marijuana, or speed, or cocaine, and it doesn’t enhance sexual performance.

“The name Ecstasy makes it sound like it’s a very sexy drug, but it doesn’t really do anything for sex at all. If anything, it may retard both male erection and climaxing. The name was made up by a dealer on the East Coast who thought it would sell more pills.”

Whatever its physical effects, Ecstasy has certainly caught the imagination of the American public, or at least the American media.

My own greatest concerns about the non-medical use of MDMA are twofold. For one, many people who should not be using this or any psychoactive drug may get lured into its non-medical use through positive hyperbole by well-meaning supporters and out-and-out proselytizers. These potential victims include the young, the drug naive, and those who are susceptible to compulsive abuse and addiction.

The second concern is one that MDMA shares with all other popular underground drugs. With no quality control, sociopathic and just plain ignorant manufacturers and dealers can sell just about anything they want to a gullible market and call it MDMA. Although the current one-year ban on MDMA may be an over-reaction, and it certainly casts a pall on research and experimental treatment, it enables the Drug Enforcement Administration to go after underground manufacturers and dealers of whatever passes for MDMA. Hopefully, this will allow enforcement, research, and treatment to work together in placing MDMA where it may do good instead of harm. •